YTread Logo
YTread Logo

LÓPEZ DÓRIGA, BETETA y otros periodistas VENDÍAN OPINIONES y ENTREVISTAS con EPN: Nancy Flores

Feb 27, 2020
tuning in, let me get into a diver mode and tell you, take it, take it, look, you're already out, you're already against the line against the line investigative journalism, a magazine that costs 30 pesos, we must support good journalism, good journalism costs chayotero journalism that earns for itself, there is no they need nothing, they make money from the outside no matter what, there is no need to work or legitimately sell their work contralínea directed by Miguel Badillo contralínea investigative journalism that today on its cover says journalists sold opinions and interviews presidential file with 780 pages contracts public deeds tax and tariff data from 43 columnist companies that includes the work of Nancy Flores, who speaks in detail on several pages with all the documents and all the evidence of what was discussed in the morning conference but here it is for the first time revealed in a clear way

nancy

flowers like these good afternoon well july thank you very much for the invitation on the contrary

nancy

well now tell us what this topic is that is on the cover today of contralínea and that has generated before being published well a series of offenses of threats of everything that occurs when good journalistic material is published, what does it consist of, please would our audience say, this is July, look, it is the first part, which in reality should be 43 parts because each company would deserve a report, however, it is good to find the line Well, they're not going to give me a chance to do that, so there are going to be fewer parts, but hey, trying to exhaust the most important things about each company, as you rightly said, it's a 780-page file, that is, something like this size, a little more of these.
l pez d riga beteta y otros periodistas vend an opiniones y entrevistas con epn nancy flores
For example, the sheets they sell in packages of 500 sheets are a little more commanding, let's say 1 and a half. However, it is important to see that this file was declassified by the National Transparency Institute and delivered by the presidency after a long process that we carried out first with The request runs out of time, they do not deliver the information, we go to the review resource, etc. Finally, the inai says that this information should be public, however, I believe that it is not all the information that the presidency has, that the presidency has kept more things to itself. to an oil I say it is a very extensive file where of course we are not giving here all the information it is just the most important because they are contracts there are tariffs there is tax information such as the RFC but also the tax histories of some media not of the 43 not of the 43 companies, but from some media it even includes their tax history.
l pez d riga beteta y otros periodistas vend an opiniones y entrevistas con epn nancy flores

More Interesting Facts About,

l pez d riga beteta y otros periodistas vend an opiniones y entrevistas con epn nancy flores...

In short, it is very extensive information, including these Google Analytics statistics, that is, not what the media say are their visits, but what is real, not what is accounted for by this Google company. In short, it is an extensive file and here in this first part what we are going to know is how the most important of those 43 companies is what I consider to be the most relevant of each one and yes well we start with four companies linked to the journalist Joaquín lópez dó

riga

no, here we speak very punctually, above all, I have highlighted one that is an anchor communication that they tell me in Joaquín lópez Dó

riga

's office that it no longer exists, it ceased to exist a year and a half ago, but well, it is the one that I highlight the most because of the type of commercialization that the commercial spaces that it sold did and you already reported in your column a little, advancing this same information and that seems very relevant to me because society has the right to know what it is that we are consuming, not as readers, but as viewers, as an audience. of radio as an audience of the written press, not and even of the new digital media because what many of these media and journalists market are their personal pages, not in the case of Joaquín it is the Joaquín lópez Dóriga dotcom page but also their radio spaces that in yes nancy the problem is not that there are advertising agreements between a company and a government for a natural exhibition of its programs or its interests in the dissemination of information that this occurs and is budgeted even in the federal budget aquila the problem is when as You say they sold opinions and interviews, that is the point and the problem also July is the discretion with which this type of resources is granted.
l pez d riga beteta y otros periodistas vend an opiniones y entrevistas con epn nancy flores
In this case we would be talking about an ethical problem when we talk about the content being sold, that is, what you issue is an opinion. like the one you do here every day in your first part of the program, if someone would finance you for that opinion, they would be influencing what you are saying, why would you say what that person wants their opinion to be expressed? No, in that sense, we would be talking about an ethical problem. The problem itself is not so much the public resources but the transparency or discretion with which they are exercised and at this moment even in this new government there is discretion and of course there was in the six-year term of Enrique Peña Nieto.
l pez d riga beteta y otros periodistas vend an opiniones y entrevistas con epn nancy flores
It is precisely these contracts that we are talking about where it must also be said that more than 62 billion pesos were spent on advertising and also on this purchase of content. That is the point, it is what we have to see as a society above all. Look here I brought this book by Ignacio Ramonet called The Explosion of Internet Journalism puts the traditional media in check where he speaks addresses precisely this media poisoning and calls it media poisoning campaigns where the media openly publishes lies in some cases and in others they are propaganda disguised as advertising and we cannot lose sight of the fact that in Mexico these poisoning campaigns are also carried out, the media also participate in it, journalists also participate in it and that is why it is very important to keep track of this information. to investigate it to get to the depths of these commercial relationships but also informative relationships because in the end many things were passed off as information that in reality were propaganda or in some cases could even be lies, which is part of what the specific sale is demonstrated here. of opinions inserted in certain programs that appeared to be informative, what we have here are the documents that the presidency was precisely keeping and when I told you that I consider that it is not all the information but only a part of it has been opened, it is because Jesús Ramírez, the spokesperson Presidential President López Obrador's spokesperson has said that they keep boxes and what I tell you is just a not very small fax, it is not even enough to fill a box and if it is part of the documents that give us an account of the sale of contents sale of comments sale of conferences sale even of the messages that are transmitted on networks as is the case of Óscar Mario Beteta that I told you here eight days ago last Tuesday precisely where these messages on social networks from this man were sold for 15 thousand pesos and They posed as if they were his, even in these documents that people can see in this printed report or on the contralínea website.
You can see there that it says with one's own style. It is recommended that the message come with the journalist's own style. Óscar Mario Beteta No, then if we are talking about the sale of content, López Dóriga specifically did what I saw that he sold a certain amount of his comments, which could be 60 seconds of something, so that is what we found or what you found regarding what They are and what they were offered and their tariff says verbatim that they are also known as a media, remove the slang from the media, they are comments or capsules by Joaquín lópez Dóriga within the programs, morning news radio programs by Óscar Mario Beteta Ciro Gómez Leyva and his own formula group newscast that is broadcast from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
Specifically, we are talking about these radio comments that are like small capsules with your sacks, these cost, let's see, if not in your code of 147 thousand pesos plus VAT in each One of these comments we are talking about is a significant amount, well, of course, and in the broadcasts that were made in other cities, a million and a half for going to another city to broadcast and something more if they had a table of journalists, yes, notice that in these media clips that We obtained through this request for information, we are talking precisely about these so-called remote controls, which is when the journalist goes and it is not the only case that is evident in this issue, it is that of Joaquín lópez Dóriga when they go to a state to a place where Someone who is present is interested in the newscast of, in this case, Joaquín López Dóriga, because if he charged one million five hundred thousand pesos plus VAT for each transmission because we must remember that in some cases it is a whole week of transmissions, then you can imagine the amount. total and also if a table that he has on Wednesdays was included, the amount amounted to one million eight hundred thousand pesos.
Here the legal representative of one of the companies tells me that this much higher cost is because the commentators who are at that table They also charged a part of these fees. No, then we are talking about an important expense that is a public expense. We must return here to say that this is part of the nation's treasury, not in the case of the federal government but also in the case of state governments. municipal when this happens it has a cost and that cost is paid by whoever invites these people in the case of governments because it is public money and that is why it is important to supervise these resources because they belong to the Mexican people, they are not patrimonial resources, they are a resource of the nation 35 thousand dollars per conference I think I have seen if you report also master conferences were also paid for with the treasury and well here the point is that practically everything was commercialized.
What I perceived when I spoke with Doña Teresa Pérez Romo is that she was like very normalized she answers me without being clear if we market it we market the spaces the comments we market the remote controls also the conferences like it is something very normalized already in the work team of joaquín lópez dóriga as if there was not something behind it in the ethical issue not that This is what we will address in another installment of this report because I have also interviewed experts in transparency, accountability and the right to information where they will talk to us about the ethical conflicts and conflicts of interest that exist when journalists They become entrepreneurs and sell their opinions or sell their content or lend themselves to this supposedly informative game that in the end ends up doing, well, that's what Ignacio Ramonet says in this book, which are poisoning campaigns, lies, propaganda, etc., while other cases tell you that draw attention is the one from lópez dóriga we are talking about Óscar Mario Beteta I saw that you have a whole collection of names here yes in general this first this first installment talks about the 43 of the 43 companies of which they have given me public records not all of them are companies, it must be said that there are four who are journalists who in a personal capacity, that is to say, as natural persons who were billed for their spaces in electronic media, another case that I would highlight is that of the announcer and businesswoman Martha de Baile and she also in these documents What they have given me is very clear that she sold, for example, the content interviews in her radio program, she offered them and she also sold other types of content on social networks, also like a little what Óscar Mario Beteta did, she also offered these mentions on her networks.
It seems to me that in general terms each medium, each company has, let's say, the most substantial part that I found in the documents, which is reflected in everything throughout the entire report. It seems very important to me that people read it very carefully because we would be talking about that each company marketed certain things or at certain prices, no, that is also another thing that may be that the sale of content is not openly, however the prices are very high, that is, they end up selling banners for 800 thousand pesos per banner, so we are talking about No, or that is what they were paid for so much money.
I mean, even if a medium has many visits, it seems to me that the expense because it is an expense with public resources is excessive in that sense. Well, people can see which are the media that had the most resources. and contrasted with the information that has been given to me, it does not come as I told you at first, tariffs, well in offices that are sent to the Treasury Secretariat, there are also articles of incorporation, there is a lot of detailed information, of course this report is not exhaustive because as I told you, there should be made 43 deliveries so that it was exhaustive, not the respect for everything that the information it brings and also very important to say that I hope the presidency, in an exercise of transparency of accountability, declassifies everything it has to deliver everything it has.
These boxes that Jesus Ramírez says he also said in an interview he gave to Contralínea said that they were boxes with documentation that revealed these relationships between columnists and the past government. It is very important that we know this as an exercise in transparency and accountability. because this is public money because at the end of the day it is important for us to know how far these poisoning campaigns went, what type of campaigns were paid for in this way, who did not, that is also very important in the files that the presidency has given me, of which I am going to continue to account for who paid and how much these columnists paid these journalists to their companies and it is very important to continue positions as statedIn journalistic slang, the money route, not the money trail, is fundamental.
Threats have received legal or physical threats. What reactions from this journalistic power? People who, as a result of this aggression, suffered from this gender violence in its variant of verbal aggression. On the part of Óscar Mario Beteta, I had to be in a meeting, we were there against the line that they are in meetings with several lawyers reviewing absolutely everything because if there were threats of lawsuits then we were reviewing all the content of this work, the lawyers, which is what they tell us Since it is a declassified file declassified by the inai, it is practically information that we can publish because it is already made public, that is, they give it to me, but anyone who requests it will give it to them and it is also very important to say that this It is an exercise in transparency in that sense because we are talking about the human right to know, we have the right to information and that is what this is about, so yes, I was there with the lawyers in several meetings, I have been having with them because, as I told you, It is not the first part so we continue to evaluate what is published, what is not published or how it is published because also many shortcomings of this type of research sometimes have to do with the language you use so you have to be very careful in that sense not to qualify the president has already qualified a certain type of press, a certain type of journalism, we are not here to judge and condemn, we are here to show the evidence, these documents, these documentations that the presidency has delivered and that, as you said in a message, a reader of yours asked you no.
What's new with this? If we all already knew it, it's not that we didn't know how much these messages were being marketed. We could have an idea of ​​what was happening, not that some very virulent messages, for example in certain political situations, could have behind them. good financing, here are the documents from this part that corresponds to the commercialization of this content and well, of course it would be very important to have more evidence more documentation is that the presidency will declassify it and make it public because finally, as I mentioned in July, this is not It is a patrimonial budget, it is not money from officials, it is not money from whoever is in charge of social communication, it is public money.
It is very important that all spending on official advertising be transparent so that it is known that there is no longer any such thing as rewarding or punishing However, to date there is still a somewhat discretionary use of the media because it has not been convenient for anyone, not even in Congress, to legislate this part because Congress itself also makes discretionary use of public resources for advertising, propaganda, etc., so it is a very important issue. that we must follow up and well in this work that is in parts then we are going to give our grain of sand well look Nancy we will have to do a section here for a few weeks of contraline on these topics with the parts that you give which is the first part I reiterate the publication is against line against line the magazine directed by Miguel Badillo and the report that Nancy Flores did in its first part thank you very much July for the space for the support for your video talk I thank you very much for both spaces not the one from last week and this one because well we know that in the end the press is also called it is known as the fourth power it is a de facto power no and they also protect each other no so I thank you very much on the contrary nancy thank you very much

If you have any copyright issue, please Contact