YTread Logo
YTread Logo

10 Weapons Worse Than Nuclear Bombs

Jun 09, 2021
hello everyone and welcome back to the top 10 trends

nuclear

bombs

brought a new era a new way of waging war we think about society and we interact with other countries but with all the fear they have generated they are not even close to one Of the worst possible

weapons

these are 10

weapons

worse

than a

nuclear

bomb number 10 kinetic bombardment also known as god rods kinetic bombardment or kinetic orbital strike is the hypothetical act of attacking a planetary surface with an inert projectile the destructive force comes solely from the kinetic energy of the projectile impacting at very high speed, the typical representation of the tactic is that of a satellite containing a magazine of tungsten bars when an attack is ordered, the launch vehicle removes one of the bars from its orbit in a suborbital trajectory that crosses the Kinetic bombardment of targets has the advantage of being able to launch projectiles from a very high angle at a very high speed, making them incredibly difficult to defend against.
10 weapons worse than nuclear bombs
Additionally, the projectiles do not require warheads and, in the simplest designs, would consist entirely of solid metal rods. The outer space treaty is designed to ban weapons of mass destruction in orbit or in outer space; However, its text does not formally define what constitutes a weapon of mass destruction, as the most common form of kinetic munition is inert tungsten rods. It is unclear whether kinetic bombing is actually prohibited. Under the treaty, the only thing really preventing us from doing so at this time is its prohibitive cost. A tungsten rod about 20 feet long and the same weight as an equivalent nuclear bomb causes about the same amount of damage with kinetic energy equivalent to about 11.5 tons of TNT, but it's not cost effective, but we can thank Spacex for making a pair of heavy falcons, a pair of rods from God.
10 weapons worse than nuclear bombs

More Interesting Facts About,

10 weapons worse than nuclear bombs...

It will be very easy to configure those satellites. Thanks, Elon, and just so you know, it's not entirely hypothetical during the Vietnam War there was limited use of the Lazy Dog Bomb, which was a steel projectile shaped like a normal bomb, but much smaller. These small inert

bombs

were dropped from aircraft at enemy troops and had the same effect as a machine gun fired vertically. The battlefield after an attack said it looked like the ground had been softened using a giant fork. The bodies had been penetrated longitudinally from the shoulder to the lower abdomen. Number nine.
10 weapons worse than nuclear bombs
Thermobaric weapons. A thermobaric weapon is a type of explosive that uses oxygen in the surrounding air to generate a high-temperature explosion and, in best practice, the blast wave typically produced by such a weapon has a duration significantly longer than that produced by a conventional condensate explosive. Thermobaric weapons are significantly more energetic than conventional condensed explosives of equal weight. They are considerably more destructive when used. against field fortifications, trenches, tunnels, bunkers, caves or buildings, and there are many types of thermobaric weapons, some of which can be mounted on portable launchers in a quote from the 2000 Human Rights Watch report, the anti-target kill mechanism alive is unique and unpleasant deaths are the pressure wave and, more importantly, the subsequent vacuum that ruptures the lungs victims suffer severe burns and will probably also inhale the burning fuel according to a CIA study the effect of an explosion Thermobaric action within confined spaces is immense.
10 weapons worse than nuclear bombs
Those close to the ignition point are destroyed. Those in the marginal areas are likely to suffer many internal and therefore invisible injuries. The shock and pressure waves cause minimal damage to brain tissue, so victims may not be knocked unconscious by the explosion, but instead suffer for several minutes as they suffocate, literally sucking air out of the air. room in a pressure wave now imagine one of these the size of a truck parked in times square vigilantes number eight the cobalt bomb a cobalt bomb is a type of salty bomb it is a nuclear weapon designed to produce a greater amount of radioactive fallout intended to contaminate a large area with radioactive material this is obviously

worse

because it makes the area much more dangerous for a much longer period of time and the fallout spreads much further this is not just a nuclear bomb it is one more nuclear bomb two is considered a doomsday device the bomb concept was described by leo zillard in 1950 his intention was not to propose that something like this be built but to show that nuclear weapons technology would soon reach the point where it could wipe out human life an apocalyptic device salty weapons then requested by the united states air force and seriously investigated but never deployed the russian federation although it has supposedly developed cobalt warheads however many commentators doubt that this is a real project and see how most likely to be prepared to leak into the United States and cause a panic number seven biological warfare Biological warfare, also known as bacteriological warfare, is the use of biological toxins or infectious agents such as bacteria and viruses with the intent to kill or incapacitate to the humans.
Biological weapons are living organisms or entities that replicate. Viruses are not technically considered living and are produced or replicated within. their host victims insect warfare is also considered a type of biological weapon biological weapons can be employed in a variety of ways to gain a strategic or tactical advantage over the enemy, whether through threat or actual deployment, biological weapons are useful as an area of denial. be lethal or non-lethal and can be directed against a single individual, a group of people or even an entire population or killed, can be developed, acquired, stored or deployed by national sites or by non-national groups, the use of biological weapons is prohibited under customary international humanitarian law the use of biological agents in an armed conflict is a war crime these are not in the same category as nuclear weapons but are still considered weapons of mass destruction goodbye entire species of animals goodbye a single person oops mutated goodbye everyone else, number six, chemical warfare, chemical warfare involves the use of the toxic properties of chemicals as weapons.
This type of warfare is distinct from nuclear warfare and biological warfare and is also considered a weapon of mass destruction. Many nations possessed large reserves of armed agents in preparation for times of war. use the hague declaration of 1899 and the hague convention of 1907 prohibited the use of poison or poisoned weapons and war, but at the end of the first world war more than 120,000 tons of gas were produced the french were the first in using chemical weapons during the First World War using tear gas probably did not realize that the effects can be more serious in war conditions than in riot control.
Official figures state around 1.3 million casualties caused directly by chemical warfare agents during the course of the war. These agents are chlorine phosphine and mustard gas about 200,000 victims were civilians civilians rarely had a warning system to alert their neighbors of danger, in addition to poor warning systems civilians often did not have effective access to gas masks after of the war, the most common method of disposal was to drop chemical weapons into the nearest large body of water. Over time, the containers corrode and the chemicals leach to the seafloor at low temperatures. Mustard gas tends to form clumps with a layer of chemical byproducts.
These clumps wash up on the shore where they look like chunks of yellowish waxy clay they are incredibly toxic number five a diamond meteorite now listen to me there are meteorites around us all the time and in fact we are working on programs to try to dispute meteorites so we can extract them we can fight with a meteorite we can control its trajectory if we can control its trajectory we can make it hit the earth I can't think of anything more destructive than a diamond meteorite it already has its own speed by the way you don't even have it put a satellite into orbit like you do with tungsten rods it has its own thing, don't believe me, have you never played planetary annihilation?
The boop pretty much destroys everything and it's diamond, so it's hard because we don't even need it. be that the big tungsten rods are only 20 feet long all we need is a small meteorite maybe 100 feet in diameter that's all solid diamond bam bye bye continent take that australia number four a gene drive a gene drive is a technology of genetic engineering that can spread a particular set of genes throughout an entire population. Gene drives can arise through a variety of mechanisms. They have been proposed to provide an effective means of genetically modifying specific populations and entire species.
This technique can be used to add, delete, alter or modify genes. Gene drives affect only species that reproduce sexually. excluding viruses or bacteria, applications already in progress include the extermination of pathogen-carrying insects, particularly mosquitoes, the control of invasive species or the elimination of resistance to herbicides or pesticides, as with any potentially powerful technique, the Gene drives can be misused in a variety of ways, for example, a gene drive intended to affect only a local population could spread throughout an entire species. This is biological warfare on a completely different level. It doesn't have to be war. They can remove traits. nasty straight from your body straight from your family lineage no more violence no more free thought no more problems with authority antimatter weapons number three an antimatter weapon is a possible device that uses antimatter as a power source a propellant or an explosive for a weapon anti-meta weapons cannot yet be produced due to the current cost of producing antimatter, although we can produce it at 63 trillion dollars per gram, plus the fact that it annihilates on contact with ordinary matter makes it very difficult to contain it.
The main advantage of such a theoretical weapon is that collisions of antimatter and matter result in the sum total of their mass energy equivalence being released as energy that is an order of magnitude greater than the energy release of fusion weapons. more efficient, annihilation requires and converts exactly equal masses of antimatter and matter through collision that releases the energy mass of both weapons smaller, they are more economically viable a modern mk3 hand grenade contains 227 grams of tnt, one billionth of One gram of positrons contains as much energy as 83 pounds of TNT, making the cost of one positron hand grenade 10 billionths of a gram of antimatter, which is a hand grenade equivalent to could be placed in a bullet. sniper only 600,000 antimatter catalyzed by nuclear postpropulsion which proposes the use of antimatter as a trigger to initiate small nuclear explosions.
These explosions would theoretically provide thrust to a spacecraft. In theory, the same technology could be used to make very small ships and possibly Antimatter-catalyzed weapons are more selective and cause less pollution in the long term and could be more politically acceptable. The most dangerous thing about antimatter-powered weapons is that they could make war cleaner and therefore more of an option in the political arena for two gray goop gray goo is a hypothetical end-of-the-world scenario involving molecular nanotechnology. in which runaway self-replicating robots consume all of the Earth's biomass while building more of themselves. The original idea assumed that the machines were designed to have this capability as they became popular.
I have assumed that machines could somehow gain this ability by accident, for example imagine a replicator designed to clean up an oil spill, instead of just eating hydrocarbons, it consumes all the carbon and therefore consumes all the carbon of the Earth, as described by Eric Drexter in his book Engines. from creation 1986 quote let's imagine such a replicator floating in a bottle of chemicals making copies of itself the first replicator assembles one copy in 1,000 seconds the two replicators then build two more in the next thousand seconds ford bill four and eight built another eight in after 10 hours there are not 36 new replicators but more than 68 billion in less than a day they would weigh a ton in less than two days they would weigh more than the earth and in another four hours they would exceed the mass of the sun and all the planets combined and number one, possibly the most dangerous thing we could ever create is artificial intelligence. artificial intelligence, sometimes calledartificial intelligence, is demonstrated by machines, in contrast to the natural intelligence displayed by humans and other animals, the extent of artificial intelligence is disputed and, as machines become increasingly capable tests that are considered to require Intelligence is often removed from the definition, a phenomenon known as the AI ​​effect.
Capabilities generally classified as AI as of 2017 include understanding human speech, proficiency at the highest level in strategic gaming systems such as chess and self-driving cars, intelligent routing and content delivery networks, and military simulations which it was the last one? Well I hope you enjoyed the video, if you liked it please give it a like below if you want to see more content please subscribe What's the best way you can think about dying? I would like to be shot into the sun with a huge cobalt rock that would turn the sun into essentially a giant cobalt explosion.
That would be great. I hope you are having a great day, bye.

If you have any copyright issue, please Contact